An analysis of how the author gains the sympathy of the reader in "Shooting an Elephant," by George Orwell

In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell finds himself in a difficult postal service involving an elephant. The fate of the elephant lies in his hands. Only he keister project the final decision. In the end, due to Orwells decision, the elephant lay last in a pool of blood. Orwell wins the sympathy of readers by expressing the twitch he feels as an Anglo-Indian in Burma, struggling with his morals, and cover a sense of compassion for the dying animal. Readers sympathize with Orwell because they discount tie in to his emotions in the moments before the geting. Being the etiolated leader, he should have been fitted to make an independent decision, but was influenced by the natives (Orwell 101). Orwell describes his feelings about being pressured to shoot the elephant: Here I was the light man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed move - seemingly the leading actor of the narrate; but in reality I was only an absurd brute pushed to and fro by the will of th ose yellow faces behind (101). Everyone has been in a stance in which he or she has been expected to be a leader. For opposite reasons people are looked to as leaders, sometimes because of their race, ethnicity, or heritage. In this case, Orwell was envision as a leader because he was British and he worked for the British Empire. Readers are able to get in touch to the fact that he does not requisite to be abashed in front of the Burmese. He declares, Every white mans vivification in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at (101). Orwell compares the elephant to the huge British Empire, and just as the elephant has upset control, he feels that when the white man turns despot it is his own freedom... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper