Compare absolute and relative morality Essay

There ar two types of cleans, absolute morality and sexual relation morality. An absolutist believes that certain things are always right or wrong no calculate the consequences or situation, while a relativist is more concerned with outcomes and believes something is either right or wrong based in certain circumstances or situations.An absolute pedagogy is a command that is true all the time, in all places and all situations. An absolutist thinks almost what is the right thing of itself, for lesson murder, because killing someone regardless of the consequences of an live up to or the results cogency occur. this means they approach is deontological. The system is simple and unproblematic to apply, as a disgust will be a crime regardless of the circumstances. An example is stealing, stealing is always wrong no matter the culture of the person, what the reasons were or when it happened make no difference stealing is universally wrong and everybody knows that.There are many strengths to absolutism. firstly, because certain things are uncomplete judged right or wrong in all situations, it makes it easier to apply than relativism. for example, in absolutism, if someone was to steal, it would be seen as wrong, while in relativism if someone steals, it might be, because they cannot afford food for their baby, so all other circumstances adopt to be taken into account. Also, it enable us to wealthy person a UN settlement of human rights, as it provides a universal code to measure everything against.However, on that point are many weakness to absolutism as ethics are deontological which means that it pays no regard to the outcome or consequences of an mouldion, so for example, if a pathetic mother stole food to feed her hungry child, this act would be judged wrong, because absolute ethics believe a crime is a crime, even though surely the stealing is for outcome and her childs life is more important. Also no one can unfeignedly know what absolute mor als are since all sources of morality are open up to peoples assessments and own interpretation.However relative morality judge things relative to the situation. it means at that place are no universally moral principles and there is no objective truth and if there is it cannot be found. There are many advantages to relativist, such as it is negotiable and takes everyones opinion into account, as it is based on peoples point of view, so no one is wrong and it also takes certain circumstances into account. For example a relativist may believe abortion is wrong, but if a poor mother with hardly any money is pregnant they might set aside abortion then, because it avoids the mother bringing a child into the world and swelled it a bad life, so with relativism they are more concerned with the outcome.However, there are a number disadvantages to relativism, such as it is very thorny to apply, as judgements are always subjective and based and influenced by peoples thoughts, musical note and opinions, so everyones ideas of what is right and wrong will be different. Relativism is a lot more difficult to apply than absolutism. Also some acts have always wrong like genocide, so relativism doesnt allow moral progress.In conclusion, absolute ethics and relativist ethics ways of judgement are both very different, both having lots of disadvantages and advantages. however in my opinion relativist judgements are better, because they take certain situations into account and acts like abortion cannot be wrong.