Horror Of War In Two Poems The Dug-Out and Breakfast Essay Example for Free

Horror Of War In Two Poems The Dug-Out and eat EssayCompare the ways on which two metrical compositions from this section convey powerful pictures of life in the trenches.Both of the poems The Dug-Out and Breakfast try to convey a message that is the futility and horror of the war. The Dug-Out shows the horror of the war by accentuating the fearfulness of shoemakers last in the poem. However, Breakfast transfers the meaning of triviality by describing the hardship in the eat time in the trenches.The Dug-Out is written as a single stanza with simple expression and sentence. The poet has chosen this structure to convey striking imagination and therefore to reflect the reality of the war. The poem begins with the adverb why to intrigue the referee and also creates a thought of uneasiness with words ungainly huddled. The poet chooses to use the metaphor of a certificate of deposit to portray the solders dying as the burning out of a candle. The alliteration guttering gold emphasizes the candle resourcefulness and also shares the pain with the reader.You wonder why is in narrative voice shows the rejection putting a sense of hopeless. The last two lines are in italic and this highlights its importance. The metaphor of fall asleep for ever symbolizes the death and this reminds the poet of the other deads. The emotive language such as sullen, drowsy states the fact that these soldiers are bordering on dementia as the fear of death has scarred them mentally. Sassoons view therefore becomes clear, that death has become as ordinary as sleep and war creates fear especially the fear of death for every soldier in any mundane condition.The title of the poem Breakfast has been chosen to put a sense of usually and triviality. Gibson chooses to use a simple verse on Breakfast as well as The Dug-out. The poem begins a simple statement we ate our eat lying on our backs. This straightforward account creates a sense of immediacy and also it begins with a seco nd person narrative we to include the reader. Gibson chooses to use imagery of everyday life to represent the terror and horror of the war. In a betting of a rugby football game, Ginger is dead because he raised his head.The killing of person in a betting during the breakfast time clearly illustrates the dreadfulness of the life in trenches. The effect of contrast is emphasized by the semi-colon this makes serve more dramatic. The poem begins and ends with the same lines emphasizes that war is in everyday life just as the have of breakfast and the shelling are also linked. Unlike The Dug-Out, there is no melancholy or emotive language in the poem whereas Giblson frequently use the simple word and slang to create a matter-of-fact tone and this generates a more horrific feeling upon the reader.Both poems portray the horror and fear of the war and make their point that war is futile by conveying powerful imagery in trenches. Both of them use the simple stanza and structure to expre ss the feeling of fear and the sense of immediacy in trenches. The Dug-Out is set in a mood of melancholy by using the pathos language such as the guttering gold candle and describing the dankness that is surrounded with. Nevertheless, Breakfast achieves the same level of horror totally by simple language as Gibson cleverly connects the war to the eating of breakfast and therefore emphasizes his intellect of triviality and fultility.